首页> 外文OA文献 >The gaps in satisfaction with transit services among BRT, metro, and bus riders: Evidence from Guangzhou
【2h】

The gaps in satisfaction with transit services among BRT, metro, and bus riders: Evidence from Guangzhou

机译:BRT,地铁和公交车乘客对过境服务的满意度差距:来自广州的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper explores transit riders’ satisfaction with bus rapid transit (BRT) and compares BRT with conventional bus and metro services using revealed preference data from Guangzhou, China. A trivariate ordered probit model is developed to examine the effects of various service attributes on riders’ overall satisfactions with the three types of transit. We find that the top-three influential attributes for satisfaction with BRT are ease of use, safety while riding, and comfort while waiting. Moreover, transit riders are most satisfied with metro, followed by BRT and conventional bus. The top-five attributes that contribute to the difference in the overall satisfaction between BRT and metro are ease of use, comfort while riding, convenience of service, travel time, and comfort while waiting. Based on the findings, we propose specific strategies that can be used to enhance BRT quality of service.
机译:本文探讨了公交乘客对快速公交(BRT)的满意度,并使用来自中国广州的已显示偏好数据将BRT与常规公交和地铁服务进行了比较。建立了三元有序概率模型,以检验各种服务属性对三种运输方式的总体满意度的影响。我们发现,对BRT满意的前三大影响因素是易用性,乘坐时的安全性和等待时的舒适性。此外,过境乘车的人对地铁最满意,其次是BRT和传统公交车。造成BRT和地铁总体满意度差异的前五位属性是易用性,乘车舒适性,服务便利性,旅行时间和候车舒适性。基于这些发现,我们提出了可用于提高BRT服务质量的特定策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号